58% of Americans believe there is a conflict in U.S. cities, support for abolishing ICE rises to 42%

58% of Americans Believe There is a Conflict in U.S. Cities; Support for Abolishing ICE Rises to 42%

According to a recent YouGov poll, nearly 6 in 10 Americans, or 58%, believe that there is a war or conflict occurring in cities across the United States. This statistic reflects growing concerns among the populace regarding safety and civil unrest in urban areas. Concurrently, support for abolishing the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency has seen a significant increase, with 42% of respondents now favoring its abolition, compared to just 19% in September 2024.

Key Details

The YouGov poll indicates a notable shift in public sentiment regarding urban safety and federal immigration enforcement. The survey reveals that 58% of Americans perceive a state of conflict in U.S. cities, suggesting a heightened awareness or concern about violence, protests, and social unrest. This perception may be influenced by various factors, including recent events, media coverage, and ongoing political discussions.

In terms of immigration policy, support for abolishing ICE has surged dramatically. In September 2024, only 19% of Americans expressed support for the abolition of the agency, while a significant 66% opposed it. However, recent survey data from research firm Civiqs shows that as of January 2026, support for abolishing ICE has risen to 42%, with 49.5% of respondents opposing the move. This change in public opinion may reflect broader discussions about immigration reform and the role of federal agencies in enforcing immigration laws.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which oversees ICE, consistently ranks among the least favored federal agencies in the United States. According to the Pew Research Center"s 2025 annual popularity poll, DHS"s low approval ratings suggest a growing discontent with its policies and practices, particularly concerning immigration enforcement and civil rights issues.

Background

The rise in support for abolishing ICE can be contextualized within the larger framework of immigration debates in the United States. ICE has faced criticism from various advocacy groups and political figures who argue that its practices contribute to the criminalization of immigrants and foster fear within communities. The agency has been at the center of numerous controversies, particularly regarding its enforcement tactics and the treatment of individuals in detention facilities.

Recent developments in the political landscape, including proposals from lawmakers such as Michigan Representative Shri Thanedar, who plans to introduce the "Abolish ICE Act," further illustrate the growing momentum behind calls for significant changes to immigration enforcement policies. This proposed legislation aims to dismantle ICE and replace it with alternative systems that prioritize humane treatment and community safety.

What"s Next

The increasing belief among Americans that there is a conflict in cities, coupled with the rising support for abolishing ICE, may have significant implications for future policy discussions and political campaigns. As public sentiment evolves, lawmakers may be compelled to address these issues more directly, potentially leading to reforms in immigration policy and law enforcement practices. The ongoing dialogue surrounding these topics will likely shape the political landscape leading up to the next election cycle.

As the situation develops, it will be essential to monitor how these perceptions influence legislative actions and the broader societal discourse on immigration and public safety in the United States.