International

SDF shows no progress in US-mediated talks, tensions rise as deadline approaches

Tensions escalate as the SDF shows no progress in US-mediated talks for integration into the Syrian government. Discover the latest insights and implications as the deadline approaches.

BY: 5 min read
SDF shows no progress in US-mediated talks, tensions rise as deadline approaches
Featured image for: SDF shows no progress in US-mediated talks, tensions rise as deadline approaches

Title: SDF Shows No Progress in US-Mediated Talks, Tensions Rise as Deadline Approaches

Author: Maya Rodriguez

Date: Friday, December 12, 2025

In a concerning development regarding the ongoing political situation in Syria, Charles Lister, a prominent analyst, reported on social media platform X that the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) have made no tangible progress in US-mediated discussions aimed at their integration into the Syrian government. Despite months of negotiations and what were described as "constructive" meetings in Damascus, the SDF has yet to implement any agreed-upon steps. This stagnation has led to rising tensions, with a potential "Plan B" now being considered as a response to the lack of movement.

Key Details

Charles Lister"s remarks highlight that the US has been actively involved in facilitating talks between the SDF and the Syrian government. These discussions have reportedly taken place over several months, involving quiet "working group" meetings in Damascus. Lister noted that these meetings were generally perceived as constructive, yet they have not resulted in any actionable steps from the SDF.

As a result of this inaction, tensions in the region have been escalating. Lister emphasized the importance of the upcoming weeks, stating they will be "vitally important" in determining whether the SDF will finally take steps toward integration with the Syrian government. The SDF has been presented with various incentives to facilitate this integration, including the establishment of divisions within the government, the assurance of full Kurdish rights, and the opportunity to hold ministerial roles, including positions within the Ministry of Defense (MOD) and the Ministry of Interior (MOI).

Despite these offers, the SDF has not made any significant moves toward integration. Lister pointed out that since early 2025, the US government"s policy, encompassing the Department of Defense (DOD), the State Department, and the White House, has shifted toward advocating for the dissolution of the SDF in favor of integration with Syria"s recognized government. This policy reflects a broader strategy that prioritizes the future of Syria under its sovereign government rather than supporting a non-state movement that lacks international recognition.

Background

The Syrian Democratic Forces, primarily composed of Kurdish fighters, have played a crucial role in the fight against ISIS in Syria. However, their status has been contentious, particularly in the context of the Syrian government"s efforts to reassert control over the country following years of civil war. The SDF"s relationship with the US has been complex, as they have relied on American support for military operations while also navigating the political landscape of a post-war Syria.

The ongoing negotiations and the US"s involvement reflect a significant shift in international dynamics concerning Syria. The US has historically supported the SDF as a key ally in the region, but the current emphasis on integration with the Syrian government indicates a potential pivot in US foreign policy.

Image for SDF shows no progress in US-mediated talks, tensions rise as deadline approaches

Image for SDF shows no progress in US-mediated talks, tensions rise as deadline approaches

What"s Next

As the deadline for action approaches, the implications of the SDF"s inaction could be profound. The lack of progress may lead to increased tensions not only within Syria but also among international stakeholders invested in the region"s stability. The potential consideration of a "Plan B" suggests that alternative strategies may be explored if the SDF does not respond to the integration offers. The coming weeks will be critical in determining the future of the SDF and its role within the broader context of Syrian governance.

For further insights into related developments, see our coverage on recent developments in international relations and how they may intersect with the situation in Syria.